Author
Listed:
- Gregory C. Rogers
(Albert Einstein College of Medicine)
- Stephen L. Rogers
(University of California)
- Tamara A. Schwimmer
(Albert Einstein College of Medicine)
- Stephanie C. Ems-McClung
(Indiana University)
- Claire E. Walczak
(Indiana University)
- Ronald D. Vale
(University of California)
- Jonathan M. Scholey
(University of California)
- David J. Sharp
(Albert Einstein College of Medicine)
Abstract
During anaphase identical sister chromatids separate and move towards opposite poles of the mitotic spindle1,2. In the spindle, kinetochore microtubules3 have their plus ends embedded in the kinetochore and their minus ends at the spindle pole. Two models have been proposed to account for the movement of chromatids during anaphase. In the ‘Pac-Man’ model, kinetochores induce the depolymerization of kinetochore microtubules at their plus ends, which allows chromatids to move towards the pole by ‘chewing up’ microtubule tracks4,5. In the ‘poleward flux’ model, kinetochores anchor kinetochore microtubules and chromatids are pulled towards the poles through the depolymerization of kinetochore microtubules at the minus ends6. Here, we show that two functionally distinct microtubule-destabilizing KinI kinesin enzymes (so named because they possess a kinesin-like ATPase domain positioned internally within the polypeptide) are responsible for normal chromatid-to-pole motion in Drosophila. One of them, KLP59C, is required to depolymerize kinetochore microtubules at their kinetochore-associated plus ends, thereby contributing to chromatid motility through a Pac-Man-based mechanism. The other, KLP10A, is required to depolymerize microtubules at their pole-associated minus ends, thereby moving chromatids by means of poleward flux.
Suggested Citation
Gregory C. Rogers & Stephen L. Rogers & Tamara A. Schwimmer & Stephanie C. Ems-McClung & Claire E. Walczak & Ronald D. Vale & Jonathan M. Scholey & David J. Sharp, 2004.
"Two mitotic kinesins cooperate to drive sister chromatid separation during anaphase,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 427(6972), pages 364-370, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:427:y:2004:i:6972:d:10.1038_nature02256
DOI: 10.1038/nature02256
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:427:y:2004:i:6972:d:10.1038_nature02256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.