Author
Listed:
- Vladimir Kefalov
(Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)
- Yingbin Fu
(Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)
- Nicholas Marsh-Armstrong
(Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)
- King-Wai Yau
(Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)
Abstract
Retinal rods and cones share a phototransduction pathway involving cyclic GMP1. Cones are typically 100 times less photosensitive than rods and their response kinetics are several times faster2, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Almost all proteins involved in phototransduction have distinct rod and cone variants. Differences in properties between rod and cone pigments have been described, such as a 10-fold shorter lifetime of the meta-II state (active conformation) of cone pigment3,4,5,6 and its higher rate of spontaneous isomerization7,8, but their contributions to the functional differences between rods and cones remain speculative. We have addressed this question by expressing human or salamander red cone pigment in Xenopus rods, and human rod pigment in Xenopus cones. Here we show that rod and cone pigments when present in the same cell produce light responses with identical amplification and kinetics, thereby ruling out any difference in their signalling properties. However, red cone pigment isomerizes spontaneously 10,000 times more frequently than rod pigment. This high spontaneous activity adapts the native cones even in darkness, making them less sensitive and kinetically faster than rods. Nevertheless, additional factors are probably involved in these differences.
Suggested Citation
Vladimir Kefalov & Yingbin Fu & Nicholas Marsh-Armstrong & King-Wai Yau, 2003.
"Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6957), pages 526-531, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:425:y:2003:i:6957:d:10.1038_nature01992
DOI: 10.1038/nature01992
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:425:y:2003:i:6957:d:10.1038_nature01992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.