Author
Listed:
- Gabrielle Rocap
(University Of Washington)
- Frank W. Larimer
(Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Joint Genome Institute)
- Jane Lamerdin
(Joint Genome Institute)
- Stephanie Malfatti
(Joint Genome Institute)
- Patrick Chain
(Joint Genome Institute
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
- Nathan A. Ahlgren
(University Of Washington)
- Andrae Arellano
(Joint Genome Institute)
- Maureen Coleman
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)
- Loren Hauser
(Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Joint Genome Institute)
- Wolfgang R. Hess
(Humboldt-University
Ocean Genome Legacy)
- Zackary I. Johnson
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)
- Miriam Land
(Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Joint Genome Institute)
- Debbie Lindell
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)
- Anton F. Post
(Interuniversity Institute of Marine Science)
- Warren Regala
(Joint Genome Institute)
- Manesh Shah
(Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Joint Genome Institute)
- Stephanie L. Shaw
(Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences
University of California)
- Claudia Steglich
(Humboldt-University)
- Matthew B. Sullivan
(Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
- Claire S. Ting
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
- Andrew Tolonen
(Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
- Eric A. Webb
(Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
- Erik R. Zinser
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering)
- Sallie W. Chisholm
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Abstract
The marine unicellular cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus is the smallest-known oxygen-evolving autotroph1. It numerically dominates the phytoplankton in the tropical and subtropical oceans2,3, and is responsible for a significant fraction of global photosynthesis. Here we compare the genomes of two Prochlorococcus strains that span the largest evolutionary distance within the Prochlorococcus lineage4 and that have different minimum, maximum and optimal light intensities for growth5. The high-light-adapted ecotype has the smallest genome (1,657,990 base pairs, 1,716 genes) of any known oxygenic phototroph, whereas the genome of its low-light-adapted counterpart is significantly larger, at 2,410,873 base pairs (2,275 genes). The comparative architectures of these two strains reveal dynamic genomes that are constantly changing in response to myriad selection pressures. Although the two strains have 1,350 genes in common, a significant number are not shared, and these have been differentially retained from the common ancestor, or acquired through duplication or lateral transfer. Some of these genes have obvious roles in determining the relative fitness of the ecotypes in response to key environmental variables, and hence in regulating their distribution and abundance in the oceans.
Suggested Citation
Gabrielle Rocap & Frank W. Larimer & Jane Lamerdin & Stephanie Malfatti & Patrick Chain & Nathan A. Ahlgren & Andrae Arellano & Maureen Coleman & Loren Hauser & Wolfgang R. Hess & Zackary I. Johnson &, 2003.
"Genome divergence in two Prochlorococcus ecotypes reflects oceanic niche differentiation,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6952), pages 1042-1047, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6952:d:10.1038_nature01947
DOI: 10.1038/nature01947
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6952:d:10.1038_nature01947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.