IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v424y2003i6948d10.1038_nature01814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Niche lability in the evolution of a Caribbean lizard community

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan B. Losos

    (Washington University)

  • Manuel Leal

    (Union College
    Vanderbilt University)

  • Richard E. Glor

    (Washington University)

  • Kevin de Queiroz

    (National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution)

  • Paul E. Hertz

    (Barnard College)

  • Lourdes Rodríguez Schettino

    (Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, CITGMA)

  • Ada Chamizo Lara

    (Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, CITGMA)

  • Todd R. Jackman

    (Villanova University)

  • Allan Larson

    (Washington University)

Abstract

Niche conservatism—the tendency for closely related species to be ecologically similar—is widespread1,2,3. However, most studies compare closely related taxa that occur in allopatry3; in sympatry, the stabilizing forces that promote niche conservatism4,5, and thus inhibit niche shifts, may be countered by natural selection favouring ecological divergence to minimize the intensity of interspecific interactions6,7. Consequently, the relative importance of niche conservatism versus niche divergence in determining community structure has received little attention7. Here, we examine a tropical lizard community in which species have a long evolutionary history of ecological interaction. We find that evolutionary divergence overcomes niche conservatism: closely related species are no more ecologically similar than expected by random divergence and some distantly related species are ecologically similar, leading to a community in which the relationship between ecological similarity and phylogenetic relatedness is very weak. Despite this lack of niche conservatism, the ecological structuring of the community has a phylogenetic component: niche complementarity only occurs among distantly related species, which suggests that the strength of ecological interactions among species may be related to phylogeny, but it is not necessarily the most closely related species that interact most strongly.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan B. Losos & Manuel Leal & Richard E. Glor & Kevin de Queiroz & Paul E. Hertz & Lourdes Rodríguez Schettino & Ada Chamizo Lara & Todd R. Jackman & Allan Larson, 2003. "Niche lability in the evolution of a Caribbean lizard community," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6948), pages 542-545, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6948:d:10.1038_nature01814
    DOI: 10.1038/nature01814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01814
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature01814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jason M Kamilar & Kathleen M Muldoon, 2010. "The Climatic Niche Diversity of Malagasy Primates: A Phylogenetic Perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Suzana Alcantara & Richard H Ree & Fernando R Martins & Lúcia G Lohmann, 2014. "The Effect of Phylogeny, Environment and Morphology on Communities of a Lianescent Clade (Bignonieae-Bignoniaceae) in Neotropical Biomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6948:d:10.1038_nature01814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.