IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v424y2003i6946d10.1038_nature01800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing

Author

Listed:
  • Duje Tadin

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Joseph S. Lappin

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Lee A. Gilroy

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Randolph Blake

    (Vanderbilt University)

Abstract

Centre–surround receptive field organization is a ubiquitous property in mammalian visual systems, presumably tailored for extracting image features that are differentially distributed over space1. In visual motion, this is evident as antagonistic interactions between centre and surround regions of the receptive fields of many direction-selective neurons in visual cortex2,3,4,5,6. In a series of psychophysical experiments we make the counterintuitive observation that increasing the size of a high-contrast moving pattern renders its direction of motion more difficult to perceive and reduces its effectiveness as an adaptation stimulus. We propose that this is a perceptual correlate of centre–surround antagonism, possibly within a population of neurons in the middle temporal visual area. The spatial antagonism of motion signals observed at high contrast gives way to spatial summation as contrast decreases. Evidently, integration of motion signals over space depends crucially on the visibility of those signals, thereby allowing the visual system to register motion information efficiently and adaptively.

Suggested Citation

  • Duje Tadin & Joseph S. Lappin & Lee A. Gilroy & Randolph Blake, 2003. "Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6946), pages 312-315, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6946:d:10.1038_nature01800
    DOI: 10.1038/nature01800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01800
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature01800?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6946:d:10.1038_nature01800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.