Author
Listed:
- Cassandra M. Miller-Butterworth
(University of Cape Town, Private Bag
University of Cape Town, Observatory
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute)
- David S. Jacobs
(University of Cape Town, Private Bag)
- Eric H. Harley
(University of Cape Town, Observatory)
Abstract
Examining patterns of inter-population genetic diversity can provide valuable information about both historical and current evolutionary processes affecting a species. Population genetic studies of flying and migratory species such as bats and birds have traditionally shown minimal population substructure, characterized by high levels of gene flow between populations1,2. In general, strongly substructured mammalian populations either are separated by non-traversable barriers or belong to terrestrial species with low dispersal abilities3. Species with female philopatry (the tendency to remain in or consistently return to the natal territory) might show strong substructure when examined with maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA, but this substructure generally disappears when biparentally inherited markers are used, owing to male-mediated gene flow4. Male-biased dispersal is considered typical for mammals5, and philopatry in both sexes is rare. Here we show strong population substructure in a migratory bat species, and philopatry in both sexes, as indicated by concordance of nuclear and mtDNA findings. Furthermore, the genetic structure correlates with local biomes and differentiation in wing morphology. There is therefore a close correlation of genetic and morphological differentiation in sympatric subspecific populations of this mammalian species.
Suggested Citation
Cassandra M. Miller-Butterworth & David S. Jacobs & Eric H. Harley, 2003.
"Strong population substructure is correlated with morphology and ecology in a migratory bat,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6945), pages 187-191, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6945:d:10.1038_nature01742
DOI: 10.1038/nature01742
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6945:d:10.1038_nature01742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.