IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v414y2001i6865d10.1038_414773a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time

Author

Listed:
  • James B. Thompson

    (University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA)

  • Johannes H. Kindt

    (University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA)

  • Barney Drake

    (University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA)

  • Helen G. Hansma

    (University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA)

  • Daniel E. Morse

    (University of California)

  • Paul K. Hansma

    (University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA)

Abstract

Despite centuries of work, dating back to Galileo1, the molecular basis of bone's toughness and strength remains largely a mystery. A great deal is known about bone microsctructure2,3,4,5 and the microcracks6,7 that are precursors to its fracture, but little is known about the basic mechanism for dissipating the energy of an impact to keep the bone from fracturing. Bone is a nanocomposite of hydroxyapatite crystals and an organic matrix. Because rigid crystals such as the hydroxyapatite crystals cannot dissipate much energy, the organic matrix, which is mainly collagen, must be involved. A reduction in the number of collagen cross links has been associated with reduced bone strength8,9,10 and collagen is molecularly elongated (‘pulled’) when bovine tendon is strained11. Using an atomic force microscope12,13,14,15,16, a molecular mechanistic origin for the remarkable toughness of another biocomposite material, abalone nacre, has been found12. Here we report that bone, like abalone nacre, contains polymers with ‘sacrificial bonds’ that both protect the polymer backbone and dissipate energy. The time needed for these sacrificial bonds to reform after pulling correlates with the time needed for bone to recover its toughness as measured by atomic force microscope indentation testing. We suggest that the sacrificial bonds found within or between collagen molecules may be partially responsible for the toughness of bone.

Suggested Citation

  • James B. Thompson & Johannes H. Kindt & Barney Drake & Helen G. Hansma & Daniel E. Morse & Paul K. Hansma, 2001. "Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6865), pages 773-776, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:414:y:2001:i:6865:d:10.1038_414773a
    DOI: 10.1038/414773a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/414773a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/414773a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sawako Yamashiro & David M. Rutkowski & Kelli Ann Lynch & Ying Liu & Dimitrios Vavylonis & Naoki Watanabe, 2023. "Force transmission by retrograde actin flow-induced dynamic molecular stretching of Talin," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Zhihao Li & Chunmei Jia & Zhi Wan & Jiayi Xue & Junchao Cao & Meng Zhang & Can Li & Jianghua Shen & Chao Zhang & Zhen Li, 2023. "Hyperbranched polymer functionalized flexible perovskite solar cells with mechanical robustness and reduced lead leakage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:414:y:2001:i:6865:d:10.1038_414773a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.