IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v414y2001i6864d10.1038_414628a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Dean

    (Evolutionary Anatomy Unit, University College London)

  • Meave G. Leakey

    (National Museums of Kenya)

  • Donald Reid

    (Oral Biology, Dental School)

  • Friedemann Schrenk

    (Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Palaeanthropologie)

  • Gary T. Schwartz

    (The George Washington University)

  • Christopher Stringer

    (Human Origins Group, The Natural History Museum)

  • Alan Walker

    (409 Carpenter Building, Pennsylvania State University)

Abstract

A modern human-like sequence of dental development, as a proxy for the pace of life history, is regarded as one of the diagnostic hallmarks of our own genus Homo1,2,3. Brain size, age at first reproduction, lifespan and other life-history traits correlate tightly with dental development4,5,6. Here we report differences in enamel growth that show the earliest fossils attributed to Homo do not resemble modern humans in their development. We used daily incremental markings in enamel to calculate rates of enamel formation in 13 fossil hominins and identified differences in this key determinant of tooth formation time. Neither australopiths nor fossils currently attributed to early Homo shared the slow trajectory of enamel growth typical of modern humans; rather, both resembled modern and fossil African apes. We then reconstructed tooth formation times in australopiths, in the ∼1.5-Myr-old Homo erectus skeleton from Nariokotome, Kenya7, and in another Homo erectus specimen, Sangiran S7-37 from Java8. These times were shorter than those in modern humans. It therefore seems likely that truly modern dental development emerged relatively late in human evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Dean & Meave G. Leakey & Donald Reid & Friedemann Schrenk & Gary T. Schwartz & Christopher Stringer & Alan Walker, 2001. "Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6864), pages 628-631, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:414:y:2001:i:6864:d:10.1038_414628a
    DOI: 10.1038/414628a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/414628a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/414628a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Martín-Francés & María Martinón-Torres & Marina Martínez de Pinillos & Cecilia García-Campos & Clément Zanolli & Priscilla Bayle & Mario Modesto-Mata & Juan Luis Arsuaga & José María Bermúdez de, 2020. "Crown tissue proportions and enamel thickness distribution in the Middle Pleistocene hominin molars from Sima de los Huesos (SH) population (Atapuerca, Spain)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-35, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:414:y:2001:i:6864:d:10.1038_414628a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.