Author
Listed:
- Stephen A. Buckley
(Organic Geochemistry Unit, Biogeochemistry Research Centre, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol)
- Richard P. Evershed
(Organic Geochemistry Unit, Biogeochemistry Research Centre, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol)
Abstract
Chemical treatments were an essential element of ancient Egyptian mummification. Although the inorganic salt natron is recognized as having a central role as a desiccant1, without the application of organic preservatives the bodies would have decomposed in the humid environment of the tombs2. The nature of the organic treatments remains obscure, because the ancient Egyptians left no written record of the process. Secondary textual evidence for mummification is provided by Herodotus3, Diodorus Siculus4, Strabo5 and Pliny6. The most important account is that of Herodotus3 (about 450 yr bc), although archaeological evidence shows that by this time the process had declined significantly and the best results had been achieved centuries before7. His account mentions myrrh, cassia, palm wine, ‘cedar oil’ (still widely disputed8,9,10) and ‘gum’; however, it is vague with respect to the specific natural products used. Here we report the results of chemical investigations of a substantial collection of samples of tissues, wrappings and ‘resinous/bituminous’ materials from provenanced and dated Egyptian mummies. We focused on examples of the ‘classic’ mummy-making culture of the Pharaonic or dynastic period, from which we can begin to track the development of mummification chronologically.
Suggested Citation
Stephen A. Buckley & Richard P. Evershed, 2001.
"Organic chemistry of embalming agents in Pharaonic and Graeco-Roman mummies,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6858), pages 837-841, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:413:y:2001:i:6858:d:10.1038_35101588
DOI: 10.1038/35101588
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:413:y:2001:i:6858:d:10.1038_35101588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.