Author
Listed:
- Haihua Gu
(Cancer Biology Program)
- Kan Saito
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School)
- Lori D. Klaman
(Cancer Biology Program)
- Junqing Shen
(Cancer Biology Program)
- Tony Fleming
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School)
- YongPing Wang
(Cancer Biology Program)
- Joanne C. Pratt
(Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering)
- Guosheng Lin
(Cancer Biology Program)
- Bing Lim
(Cancer Biology Program)
- Jean-Pierre Kinet
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School)
- Benjamin G. Neel
(Cancer Biology Program)
Abstract
Dos/Gab family scaffolding adapters (Dos, Gab1, Gab2) bind several signal relay molecules, including the protein-tyrosine phosphatase Shp-2 and phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI(3)K); they are also implicated in growth factor, cytokine and antigen receptor signal transduction1. Mice lacking Gab1 die during embryogenesis and show defective responses to several stimuli2,3. Here we report that Gab2-/- mice are viable and generally healthy; however, the response (for example, degranulation and cytokine gene expression) of Gab2-/- mast cells to stimulation of the high affinity immunoglobulin-ε (IgE) receptor FcεRI is defective. Accordingly, allergic reactions such as passive cutaneous and systemic anaphylaxis are markedly impaired in Gab2-/- mice. Biochemical analyses reveal that signalling pathways dependent on PI(3)K, a critical component of FcεRI signalling, are defective in Gab2-/- mast cells. Our data identify Gab2 as the principal activator of PI(3)K in response to FcεRI activation, thereby providing genetic evidence that Dos/Gab family scaffolds regulate the PI(3)K pathway in vivo. Gab2 and/or its associated signalling molecules may be new targets for developing drugs to treat allergy.
Suggested Citation
Haihua Gu & Kan Saito & Lori D. Klaman & Junqing Shen & Tony Fleming & YongPing Wang & Joanne C. Pratt & Guosheng Lin & Bing Lim & Jean-Pierre Kinet & Benjamin G. Neel, 2001.
"Essential role for Gab2 in the allergic response,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6843), pages 186-190, July.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:412:y:2001:i:6843:d:10.1038_35084076
DOI: 10.1038/35084076
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:412:y:2001:i:6843:d:10.1038_35084076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.