IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v410y2001i6830d10.1038_35071177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not just old but old and cold?

Author

Listed:
  • Colin I. Smith

    (Fossil Fuels and Environmental Geochemistry (Postgraduate Institute), NRG, Drummond Building, University of Newcastle)

  • Andrew T. Chamberlain

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Michael S. Riley

    (School of Earth Sciences, University of Birmingham)

  • Alan Cooper

    (University of Oxford)

  • Chris B. Stringer

    (The Natural History Museum)

  • Matthew J. Collins

    (Fossil Fuels and Environmental Geochemistry (Postgraduate Institute), NRG, Drummond Building, University of Newcastle)

Abstract

The successful retrieval of ancient DNA from two geographically dispersed Neanderthal skeletons1,2 has fuelled a demand for more Neanderthal DNA sequences for analysis. However, these exceptionally well-preserved specimens were geologically young and the mean annual temperature of their cave sites low, so the survival of this ancient DNA could have been due to unusually favourable conditions. Here we calculate the thermal history of a range of Holocene and Pleistocene bones whose DNA quality has been tested and find that in only very few sites with Neanderthal remains is the preservation of DNA likely to match the quality of that from the skeleton found at Mezmaiskaya Cave2. We recommend that any additional Neanderthal destined for destructive analysis should be carefully selected, taking into account its integrated thermal history.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin I. Smith & Andrew T. Chamberlain & Michael S. Riley & Alan Cooper & Chris B. Stringer & Matthew J. Collins, 2001. "Not just old but old and cold?," Nature, Nature, vol. 410(6830), pages 771-772, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:410:y:2001:i:6830:d:10.1038_35071177
    DOI: 10.1038/35071177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35071177
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35071177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:410:y:2001:i:6830:d:10.1038_35071177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.