IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v409y2001i6822d10.1038_35057185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of human genetic and sequence-based physical maps

Author

Listed:
  • Adong Yu

    (Center for Medical Genetics, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation)

  • Chengfeng Zhao

    (Center for Medical Genetics, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation)

  • Ying Fan

    (Center for Medical Genetics, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation)

  • Wonhee Jang

    (National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health)

  • Andrew J. Mungall

    (The Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus)

  • Panos Deloukas

    (The Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus)

  • Anne Olsen

    (Joint Genome Institute)

  • Norman A. Doggett

    (Los Alamos National Laboratory)

  • Nader Ghebranious

    (Center for Medical Genetics, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation)

  • Karl W. Broman

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • James L. Weber

    (Center for Medical Genetics, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation)

Abstract

Recombination is the exchange of information between two homologous chromosomes during meiosis. The rate of recombination per nucleotide, which profoundly affects the evolution of chromosomal segments, is calculated by comparing genetic and physical maps. Human physical maps have been constructed using cytogenetics1, overlapping DNA clones2 and radiation hybrids3; but the ultimate and by far the most accurate physical map is the actual nucleotide sequence. The completion of the draft human genomic sequence4 provides us with the best opportunity yet to compare the genetic and physical maps. Here we describe our estimates of female, male and sex-average recombination rates for about 60% of the genome. Recombination rates varied greatly along each chromosome, from 0 to at least 9 centiMorgans per megabase (cM Mb-1). Among several sequence and marker parameters tested, only relative marker position along the metacentric chromosomes in males correlated strongly with recombination rate. We identified several chromosomal regions up to 6 Mb in length with particularly low (deserts) or high (jungles) recombination rates. Linkage disequilibrium was much more common and extended for greater distances in the deserts than in the jungles.

Suggested Citation

  • Adong Yu & Chengfeng Zhao & Ying Fan & Wonhee Jang & Andrew J. Mungall & Panos Deloukas & Anne Olsen & Norman A. Doggett & Nader Ghebranious & Karl W. Broman & James L. Weber, 2001. "Comparison of human genetic and sequence-based physical maps," Nature, Nature, vol. 409(6822), pages 951-953, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:409:y:2001:i:6822:d:10.1038_35057185
    DOI: 10.1038/35057185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35057185
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35057185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joshua M Akey & Michael A Eberle & Mark J Rieder & Christopher S Carlson & Mark D Shriver & Deborah A Nickerson & Leonid Kruglyak, 2004. "Population History and Natural Selection Shape Patterns of Genetic Variation in 132 Genes," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(10), pages 1-1, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:409:y:2001:i:6822:d:10.1038_35057185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.