IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v408y2000i6813d10.1038_35047160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An electoral butterfly effect

Author

Listed:
  • Robert C. Sinclair

    (P-343 BioSci, University of Alberta)

  • Melvin M. Mark

    (Pennsylvania State University, Moore Building, University Park)

  • Sean E. Moore

    (P-343 BioSci, University of Alberta)

  • Carrie A. Lavis

    (P-343 BioSci, University of Alberta)

  • Alexander S. Soldat

    (P-343 BioSci, University of Alberta)

Abstract

Part of the controversy surrounding this year's presidential election in the United States concerns the potential for systematic bias in the ballot-card format — could the butterfly ballot used in Palm Beach County, Florida, have led to confusion and caused people who had intended to vote for Al Gore to vote for Pat Buchanan by mistake? Here we show that not only is the double-column butterfly ballot more confusing than a single-column ballot, but that it also appears to cause systematic errors in voting which call into question the validity of the results from Palm Beach County in the 2000 United States presidential election.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert C. Sinclair & Melvin M. Mark & Sean E. Moore & Carrie A. Lavis & Alexander S. Soldat, 2000. "An electoral butterfly effect," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6813), pages 665-666, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:408:y:2000:i:6813:d:10.1038_35047160
    DOI: 10.1038/35047160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35047160
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35047160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:408:y:2000:i:6813:d:10.1038_35047160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.