Author
Listed:
- Laura M. Bohn
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center)
- Raul R. Gainetdinov
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center)
- Fang-Tsyr Lin
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center)
- Robert J. Lefkowitz
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center)
- Marc G. Caron
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute Laboratories, Duke University Medical Center)
Abstract
Morphine is a powerful pain reliever, but also a potent inducer of tolerance and dependence. The development of opiate tolerance occurs on continued use of the drug such that the amount of drug required to elicit pain relief must be increased to compensate for diminished responsiveness1,2,3. In many systems, decreased responsiveness to agonists has been correlated with the desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors. In vitro evidence indicates that this process involves phosphorylation of G-protein-coupled receptors and subsequent binding of regulatory proteins called β-arrestins4,5. Using a knockout mouse lacking β-arrestin-2 (βarr2-/-), we have assessed the contribution of desensitization of the μ-opioid receptor to the development of morphine antinociceptive tolerance and the subsequent onset of physical dependence. Here we show that in mice lacking β-arrestin-2, desensitization of the μ-opioid receptor does not occur after chronic morphine treatment, and that these animals fail to develop antinociceptive tolerance. However, the deletion of β-arrestin-2 does not prevent the chronic morphine-induced upregulation of adenylyl cyclase activity, a cellular marker of dependence, and the mutant mice still become physically dependent on the drug.
Suggested Citation
Laura M. Bohn & Raul R. Gainetdinov & Fang-Tsyr Lin & Robert J. Lefkowitz & Marc G. Caron, 2000.
"μ-Opioid receptor desensitization by β-arrestin-2 determines morphine tolerance but not dependence,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6813), pages 720-723, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:408:y:2000:i:6813:d:10.1038_35047086
DOI: 10.1038/35047086
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:408:y:2000:i:6813:d:10.1038_35047086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.