Author
Listed:
- Daniel Stern
(Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology)
- Peter Eisenhardt
(Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology)
- Hyron Spinrad
(University of California at Berkeley)
- Steve Dawson
(University of California at Berkeley)
- Wil van Breugel
(Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, L-413)
- Arjun Dey
(KPNO/NOAO)
- Wim de Vries
(Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, L-413)
- S. A. Stanford
(Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, L-413
University of California at Davis)
Abstract
The identification of galaxies at extreme distances provides the most direct information about the earliest phases of galaxy formation. But at redshifts z > 5 even the most luminous galaxies appear faint; the interpretation of low signal-to-noise ratio data is difficult and misidentifications do occur. Here we report optical and near-infrared observations of the source STIS123627+621755, which was previously suggested to be at a redshift of 6.68 (ref. 1). At that redshift, and with the reported1 spectral energy distribution, the galaxy should be essentially invisible at wavelengths less than 9,300 Å, because the intervening intergalactic medium absorbs almost all light energetic enough to ionize neutral hydrogen—that is, with wavelengths less than the redshifted Lyman limit of λ = (1 + z) × 912 Å. At near-infrared wavelengths, however, the galaxy should be relatively bright. Here we report a detection of the galaxy at 6,700 Å and a non-detection at a wavelength of 1.2 µm, contrary to expectations for z ≈ 6.68. The data conservatively require that STIS123627+621755 has a redshift z
Suggested Citation
Daniel Stern & Peter Eisenhardt & Hyron Spinrad & Steve Dawson & Wil van Breugel & Arjun Dey & Wim de Vries & S. A. Stanford, 2000.
"Evidence against a redshift z > 6 for the galaxy STIS123627+621755,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6812), pages 560-562, November.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:408:y:2000:i:6812:d:10.1038_35046027
DOI: 10.1038/35046027
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:408:y:2000:i:6812:d:10.1038_35046027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.