IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v407y2000i6801d10.1038_35025138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual conflict and speciation

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Tregenza

    (School of Biology, University of Leeds)

  • Roger K. Butlin

    (School of Biology, University of Leeds)

  • Nina Wedell

    (School of Biology, University of Leeds)

Abstract

Sexual conflict occurs because males are selected to produce as many offspring as possible, even if this means lowering the overall reproductive output of individual females. A new model proposed by Gavrilets1 suggests that strong asymmetries between males and females in the costs and benefits of mating will create runaway coevolution between the sexes, promoting rapid divergence between populations and hence speciation. This is an intriguing possibility, not least because it runs counter to existing models2 which suggest that greater sexual conflict will result in males mating more indiscriminately, breaking down reproductive barriers between divergent populations. One reason for this difference is that the new model is based on the idea that females can avoid costs of mating if they are incompatible with some males, whereas we suggest that in reality this may rarely be the case.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Tregenza & Roger K. Butlin & Nina Wedell, 2000. "Sexual conflict and speciation," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6801), pages 149-150, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:407:y:2000:i:6801:d:10.1038_35025138
    DOI: 10.1038/35025138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35025138
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35025138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:407:y:2000:i:6801:d:10.1038_35025138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.