IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v406y2000i6796d10.1038_35020577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NO is necessary and sufficient for egg activation at fertilization

Author

Listed:
  • Richard C. Kuo

    (Neurosciences Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Gregory T. Baxter

    (Cornell Nanofabrication Facility, Knight Laboratory, Cornell University)

  • Stuart H. Thompson

    (Neurosciences Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Stephen A. Stricker

    (University of New Mexico)

  • Chris Patton

    (Stanford University)

  • Joseph Bonaventura

    (Duke University Medical Center
    Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke Marine Biomedical Center)

  • David Epel

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

The early steps that lead to the rise in calcium and egg activation at fertilization are unknown but of great interest—particularly with the advent of in vitro fertilization techniques for treating male infertility and whole-animal cloning by nuclear transfer. This calcium rise is required for egg activation and the subsequent events of development in eggs of all species1,2. Injection of intact sperm or sperm extracts can activate eggs, suggesting that sperm-derived factors may be involved. Here we show that nitric oxide synthase is present at high concentration and active in sperm after activation by the acrosome reaction. An increase in nitrosation within eggs is evident seconds after insemination and precedes the calcium pulse of fertilization. Microinjection of nitric oxide donors or recombinant nitric oxide synthase recapitulates events of egg activation, whereas prior injection of oxyhaemoglobin, a physiological nitric oxide scavenger, prevents egg activation after fertilization. We conclude that nitric oxide synthase and nitric-oxide-related bioactivity satisfy the primary criteria of an egg activator: they are present in an appropriate place, active at an appropriate time, and are necessary and sufficient for successful fertilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard C. Kuo & Gregory T. Baxter & Stuart H. Thompson & Stephen A. Stricker & Chris Patton & Joseph Bonaventura & David Epel, 2000. "NO is necessary and sufficient for egg activation at fertilization," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6796), pages 633-636, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6796:d:10.1038_35020577
    DOI: 10.1038/35020577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35020577
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35020577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. T. Krejčová & J. Petr & M. Krejčová & K. Kheilová, 2009. "Effects of cycloheximide or 6-dimethyl aminopurine on the parthenogenetic activation of pig oocytes using pulsatile treatment with nitric oxide donor," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(7), pages 293-306.
    2. J. Petr & E. Chmelíková & L. Tůmová & M. Ješeta, 2007. "The role of nitric oxide in parthenogenetic activation of pig oocytes: A review," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(11), pages 363-377.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6796:d:10.1038_35020577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.