Author
Listed:
- Hacho B. Bohossian
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Whitehead Institute
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 9 Cambridge Center)
- Helen Skaletsky
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Whitehead Institute
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 9 Cambridge Center)
- David C. Page
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Whitehead Institute
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 9 Cambridge Center)
Abstract
In 1947, it was suggested that, in humans, the mutation rate is dramatically higher in the male germ line than in the female germ line1. This hypothesis has been supported by the observation that, among primates, Y-linked genes evolved more rapidly than homologous X-linked genes2,3,4,5,6. Based on these evolutionary studies, the ratio (αm) of male to female mutation rates in primates was estimated to be about 5. However, selection could have skewed sequence evolution in introns and exons7,8,9,10. In addition, some of the X–Y gene pairs studied lie within chromosomal regions with substantially divergent nucleotide sequences7,11,12. Here we directly compare human X and Y sequences within a large region with no known genes. Here the two chromosomes are 99% identical, and X–Y divergence began only three or four million years ago, during hominid evolution13,14,15. In apes, homologous sequences exist only on the X chromosome. We sequenced and compared 38.6 kb of this region from human X, human Y, chimpanzee X and gorilla X chromosomes. We calculated αm to be 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.15–2.87), significantly lower than previous estimates in primates. We infer that, in humans and their immediate ancestors, male and female mutation rates were far more similar than previously supposed.
Suggested Citation
Hacho B. Bohossian & Helen Skaletsky & David C. Page, 2000.
"Unexpectedly similar rates of nucleotide substitution found in male and female hominids,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6796), pages 622-625, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6796:d:10.1038_35020557
DOI: 10.1038/35020557
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6796:d:10.1038_35020557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.