Author
Listed:
- Claude Saint-Ruf
(Institut Necker, U INSERM 373, Faculté de Médecine Necker)
- Maddalena Panigada
(Unité INRA 806, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique)
- Orly Azogui
(Institut Necker, U INSERM 373, Faculté de Médecine Necker)
- Pascale Debey
(Università degli Studi di Milano)
- Harald von Boehmer
(Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)
- Fabio Grassi
(Institut Necker, U INSERM 373, Faculté de Médecine Necker
Unité INRA 806, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique)
Abstract
Lineage choice is of great interest in developmental biology. In the immune system, the αβ and γδ lineages of T lymphocytes diverge during the course of the β-, γ- and δ-chain rearrangement of T-cell receptor (TCR) genes that takes place within the same precursor cell and which results in the formation of the γδTCR or pre-TCR proteins1,2,3. The pre-TCR consists of the TCRβ chain covalently linked to the pre-TCRα protein, which is present in immature but not in mature T cells which instead express the TCRα chain4,5. Animals deficient in pre-TCRα have few αβ lineage cells but an increased number of γδ T cells. These γδ T cells exhibit more extensive TCRβ rearrangement than γδ T cells from wild-type mice6,7. These observations are consistent with the idea that different signals emanating from the γδTCR and pre-TCR instruct lineage commitment8. Here we show, by using confocal microscopy and biochemistry to analyse the initiation of signalling, that the pre-TCR but not the γδTCR colocalizes with the p56lck Src kinase into glycolipid-enriched membrane domains (rafts) apparently without any need for ligation. This results in the phosphorylation of CD3ε and Zap-70 signal transducing molecules. The results indicate clear differences between pre-TCR and γδTCR signalling.
Suggested Citation
Claude Saint-Ruf & Maddalena Panigada & Orly Azogui & Pascale Debey & Harald von Boehmer & Fabio Grassi, 2000.
"Different initiation of pre-TCR and γδTCR signalling,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6795), pages 524-527, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6795:d:10.1038_35020093
DOI: 10.1038/35020093
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6795:d:10.1038_35020093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.