IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v406y2000i6792d10.1038_35018098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A one-hit model of cell death in inherited neuronal degenerations

Author

Listed:
  • Geoff Clarke

    (Programs in Developmental Biology and Genetics, The Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children
    Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics)

  • Richard A. Collins

    (Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics)

  • Blair R. Leavitt

    (Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics)

  • David F. Andrews

    (University of Toronto)

  • Michael R. Hayden

    (Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics)

  • Charles J. Lumsden

    (University of Toronto)

  • Roderick R. McInnes

    (Programs in Developmental Biology and Genetics, The Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children
    Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics
    Pediatrics
    University of Toronto)

Abstract

In genetic disorders associated with premature neuronal death, symptoms may not appear for years or decades. This delay in clinical onset is often assumed to reflect the occurrence of age-dependent cumulative damage1,2,3,4,5,6. For example, it has been suggested that oxidative stress disrupts metabolism in neurological degenerative disorders by the cumulative damage of essential macromolecules1,4,7. A prediction of the cumulative damage hypothesis is that the probability of cell death will increase over time. Here we show in contrast that the kinetics of neuronal death in 12 models of photoreceptor degeneration, hippocampal neurons undergoing excitotoxic cell death8, a mouse model of cerebellar degeneration9 and Parkinson's10 and Huntington's diseases are all exponential and better explained by mathematical models in which the risk of cell death remains constant or decreases exponentially with age. These kinetics argue against the cumulative damage hypothesis; instead, the time of death of any neuron is random. Our findings are most simply accommodated by a ‘one-hit’ biochemical model in which mutation imposes a mutant steady state on the neuron and a single event randomly initiates cell death. This model appears to be common to many forms of neurodegeneration and has implications for therapeutic strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoff Clarke & Richard A. Collins & Blair R. Leavitt & David F. Andrews & Michael R. Hayden & Charles J. Lumsden & Roderick R. McInnes, 2000. "A one-hit model of cell death in inherited neuronal degenerations," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6792), pages 195-199, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6792:d:10.1038_35018098
    DOI: 10.1038/35018098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35018098
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35018098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raúl de la Fuente-Fernández, 2006. "Impact of Neuroprotection on Incidence of Alzheimer's Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Sreelakshmi Vasudevan & Subhadip Senapati & Maryanne Pendergast & Paul S.–H. Park, 2024. "Aggregation of rhodopsin mutants in mouse models of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Ishwar K Puri & Liwu Li, 2010. "Mathematical Modeling for the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-5, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6792:d:10.1038_35018098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.