IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v406y2000i6791d10.1038_35017552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Brooks

    (School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University)

Abstract

Indirect selection of female mating preferences may result from a genetic association between male attractiveness and offspring fitness1,2. The offspring of attractive males may have enhanced growth3,4,5, fecundity3,4, viability5,6,7,8 or attractiveness4,9,10,11. However, the extent to which attractive males bear genes that reduce other fitness components has remained unexplored. Here I show that sexual attractiveness in male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) is heritable and genetically correlated with ornamentation. Like ornamentation12,13,14, attractiveness may be substantially Y-linked. The benefit of mating with attractive males, and thus having attractive sons, is opposed by strong negative genetic correlation between attractiveness and both offspring survival and the number of sons maturing. Such correlations suggest either antagonistic pleiotropy between attractiveness and survival or linkage disequilibrium between attractive and deleterious alleles. The presence of many colour pattern genes on or near the non-recombining section of the Y chromosome may facilitate the accumulation of deleterious mutations by genetic hitch-hiking15,16. These findings show that genes enhancing sexual attractiveness may be associated with pleiotropic costs or heavy mutational loads.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Brooks, 2000. "Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6791), pages 67-70, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6791:d:10.1038_35017552
    DOI: 10.1038/35017552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35017552
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35017552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:406:y:2000:i:6791:d:10.1038_35017552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.