IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v405y2000i6786d10.1038_35014600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Highly fecund mothers sacrifice offspring survival to maximize fitness

Author

Listed:
  • Sigurd Einum

    (Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
    Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Ian A. Fleming

    (Norwegian Institute for Nature Research)

Abstract

Why do highly fecund organisms apparently sacrifice offspring size for increased numbers when offspring survival generally increases with size1,2,3? The theoretical tools for understanding this evolutionary trade-off between number and size of offspring have developed over the past 25 years1,4,5,6,7,8,9,10; however, the absence of data on the relation between offspring size and fitness in highly fecund species, which would control for potentially confounding variables, has caused such models to remain largely hypothetical11,12. Here we manipulate egg size, controlling for maternal trait interactions, and determine the causal consequences of offspring size in a wild population of Atlantic salmon. The joint effect of egg size on egg number and offspring survival resulted in stabilizing phenotypic selection for an optimal size. The optimal egg size differed only marginally from the mean value observed in the population, suggesting that it had evolved mainly in response to selection on maternal rather than offspring fitness. We conclude that maximization of maternal fitness by sacrificing offspring survival may well be a general phenomenon among highly fecund organisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sigurd Einum & Ian A. Fleming, 2000. "Highly fecund mothers sacrifice offspring survival to maximize fitness," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6786), pages 565-567, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:405:y:2000:i:6786:d:10.1038_35014600
    DOI: 10.1038/35014600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35014600
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35014600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:405:y:2000:i:6786:d:10.1038_35014600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.