IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v404y2000i6777d10.1038_35006664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The duration of antigen receptor signalling determines CD4+ versus CD8+ T-cell lineage fate

Author

Listed:
  • Koji Yasutomo

    (Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health)

  • Carolyn Doyle

    (Duke University Medical Centre)

  • Lucio Miele

    (Cancer Immunology Program, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Centre, Loyola University Medical Centre)

  • Ronald N. Germain

    (Lymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health)

Abstract

Signals elicited by binding of the T-cell antigen receptor and the CD4/CD8 co-receptor to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules control the generation of CD4+ (helper) or CD8+ (cytotoxic) T cells from thymic precursors that initially express both co-receptor proteins1. These precursors have unique, clonally distributed T-cell receptors with unpredictable specificity for the self-MHC molecules involved in this differentiation process2. However, the mature T cells that emerge express only the CD4 (MHC class II-binding) or CD8 (MHC class I-binding) co-receptor that complements the MHC class-specificity of the T-cell receptor. How this matching of co-receptor-defined lineage and T-cell-receptor specificity is achieved remains unknown1,3,4, as does whether signalling by the T-cell receptors, co-receptors and/or general cell-fate regulators such as Notch-1 (refs 5, 6) contributes to initial lineage choice, to subsequent differentiation processes or to both. Here we show that the CD4 versus CD8 lineage fate of immature thymocytes is controlled by the co-receptor-influenced duration of initial T-cell receptor-dependent signalling. Notch-1 does not appear to be essential for this fate determination, but it is selectively required for CD8+ T-cell maturation after commitment directed by T-cell receptors. This indicates that the signals constraining CD4 versus CD8 lineage decisions are distinct from those that support subsequent differentiation events such as silencing of co-receptor loci.

Suggested Citation

  • Koji Yasutomo & Carolyn Doyle & Lucio Miele & Ronald N. Germain, 2000. "The duration of antigen receptor signalling determines CD4+ versus CD8+ T-cell lineage fate," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6777), pages 506-510, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:404:y:2000:i:6777:d:10.1038_35006664
    DOI: 10.1038/35006664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35006664
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35006664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hallan Souza-e-Silva & Wilson Savino & Raúl A Feijóo & Ana Tereza Ribeiro Vasconcelos, 2009. "A Cellular Automata-Based Mathematical Model for Thymocyte Development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:404:y:2000:i:6777:d:10.1038_35006664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.