Author
Listed:
- Ari Koskelainen
(Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, PO Box 2200, Helsinki University of Technology)
- Petri Ala-Laurila
(Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, PO Box 2200, Helsinki University of Technology)
- Nanna Fyhrquist
(FIN-00014 University of Helsinki)
- Kristian Donner
(FIN-00014 University of Helsinki)
Abstract
Activation of a visual pigment molecule to initiate phototransduction requires a minimum energy, Ea, that need not be wholly derived from a photon, but may be supplemented by heat1. Theory2,3 predicts that absorbance at very long wavelengths declines with the fraction of molecules that have a sufficient complement of thermal energy, and that Ea is inversely related to the wavelength of maximum absorbance (λmax) of the pigment. Consistent with the first of these predictions, warming increases relative visual sensitivity to long wavelengths4,5,6,7,8. Here we measure this effect in amphibian photoreceptors with different pigments to estimate Ea (refs 2, 5,6,7) and test experimentally the predictions of an inverse relation between Ea and λmax. For rods and ‘red’ cones in the adult frog retina, we find no significant difference in Ea between the two pigments involved, although their λmax values are very different. We also determined Ea for the rhodopsin in toad retinal rods—spectrally similar to frog rhodopsin but differing in amino-acid sequence—and found that it was significantly higher. In addition, we estimated Ea for two pigments whose λmax difference was due only to a chromophore difference (A1 and A2 pigment, in adult and larval frog cones). Here Ea for A2 was lower than for A1. Our results refute the idea of a necessary relation between λmax and Ea, but show that the A1 → A2 chromophore substitution decreases Ea.
Suggested Citation
Ari Koskelainen & Petri Ala-Laurila & Nanna Fyhrquist & Kristian Donner, 2000.
"Measurement of thermal contribution to photoreceptor sensitivity,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6766), pages 220-223, January.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:403:y:2000:i:6766:d:10.1038_35003242
DOI: 10.1038/35003242
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:403:y:2000:i:6766:d:10.1038_35003242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.