IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v401y1999i6751d10.1038_43937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins

Author

Listed:
  • Yaoqi Zhou

    (Harvard University)

  • Martin Karplus

    (Harvard University
    Laboratoire de Chimie Biophysique, ISIS, Université Louis Pasteur)

Abstract

The detailed mechanism of protein folding is one of the major problems in structural biology1,2. Its solution is of practical as well as fundamental interest because of its possible role in utilizing the many sequences becoming available from genomic analysis3. Although the Levinthal paradox4 (namely, that a polypeptide chain can find its unique native state in spite of the astronomical number of configurations in the denatured state) has been resolved4,5,6,7, the reasons for the differences in the folding behaviour of individual proteins remain to be elucidated. Here a Cα-based three-helix-bundle-like protein model with a realistic thermodynamic phase diagram is used to calculate several hundred folding trajectories. By varying a single parameter, the difference between the strength of native and non-native contacts, folding is changed from a diffusion–collision mechanism8 to one that involves simultaneous collapse and partial secondary-structure formation, followed by reorganization to the native structure. Non-obligatory intermediates are important in the former, whereas there is an obligatory on-pathway intermediate in the latter. Our results provide a basis for understanding the range of folding behaviour that is observed in helical proteins.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaoqi Zhou & Martin Karplus, 1999. "Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6751), pages 400-403, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:401:y:1999:i:6751:d:10.1038_43937
    DOI: 10.1038/43937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/43937
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/43937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:401:y:1999:i:6751:d:10.1038_43937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.