IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v401y1999i6751d10.1038_43827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intron size and natural selection

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Bernardo Carvalho

    (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
    Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics)

  • Andrew G. Clark

    (Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics)

Abstract

Intron sizes vary widely among different genes and among homologous genes of different species. The distribution of intron sizes may be maintained in a steady state, reflecting the processes of insertion and deletion of gene sequences, or it may be that the distribution is constrained by natural selection1,2,3. If intron size is governed by natural selection, there should be a statistical association between this size and the rate of recombination per map unit of the genome, assuming that natural selection is less effective in genomic regions of low recombination4,5,6. Here we show that larger introns of Drosophila melanogaster occur preferentially in regions of low recombination, which is consistent with large introns having a deleterious effect. The association is significant (P=40.001, linear regression), despite the fact that no effort was made to stratify the data by other factors that affect intron size, such as the size of the associated coding region7 or the presence of regulatory sequences inside the intron.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Bernardo Carvalho & Andrew G. Clark, 1999. "Intron size and natural selection," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6751), pages 344-344, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:401:y:1999:i:6751:d:10.1038_43827
    DOI: 10.1038/43827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/43827
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/43827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:401:y:1999:i:6751:d:10.1038_43827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.