IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v397y1999i6720d10.1038_17600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern

Author

Listed:
  • Shin'ya Nishida

    (Human and Information Science Research Laboratory, NTT Communication Science Laboratories)

  • Alan Johnston

    (University College London)

Abstract

After adaptation of the visual system to motion of a pattern in a particular direction, a static pattern appears to move in the opposite direction—the motion aftereffect (MAE)1,2. It is thought that the MAE is not accompanied by a shift in perceived spatial position of the pattern being viewed3,4, providing psychophysical evidence for a dissociation of the neural processing of motion and position that complements anatomical and physiological evidence of functional specialization in primate and human visual cortex5,6,7. However, here we measure the perceived orientation of a static windmill pattern after adaptation to rotary motion and find a gradual shift in orientation in the direction of the illusory rotation, though at a rate much lower than the apparent rotation speed. The orientation shift, which started to decline within a few seconds, could persist longer than the MAE, and disappeared when the MAE was nulled by physical motion of the windmill pattern. Our results indicate that the representation of the position of spatial pattern is dynamically updated by neurons involved in the analysis of motion.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin'ya Nishida & Alan Johnston, 1999. "Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern," Nature, Nature, vol. 397(6720), pages 610-612, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:397:y:1999:i:6720:d:10.1038_17600
    DOI: 10.1038/17600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/17600
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/17600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:397:y:1999:i:6720:d:10.1038_17600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.