Author
Listed:
- Asha Nayak
(Neuroscience Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center)
- Devon J. Zastrow
(Neuroscience Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center)
- Ronald Lickteig
(Department of Pharmacology)
- Nancy R. Zahniser
(Department of Pharmacology
Neuroscience Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center)
- Michael D. Browning
(Department of Pharmacology
Neuroscience Program, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center)
Abstract
Long-term potentiation (LTP) is a form of synaptic plasticity that has been extensively studied as a putative mechanism underlying learning and memory. A late phase of LTP occurring 3–5 hours after stimulation and depending on transcription, protein synthesis and cyclic-AMP-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase A, or PKA) has been described1,2,3, but it is not known whether transcription of presynaptic and/or postsynaptic genes is required to support late-phase LTP. Here we show that late-phase LTP can be obtained in rat hippocampal CA1 mini-slices in which the cell bodies of presynaptic Schaffer collateral/commissural fibres are removed. Thus, transcription of presynaptic genes is not necessary to support maintenance of late-phase LTP. The AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate) receptor is the predominant mediator of the ionotropic response to synaptically released glutamate in the hippocampus and it has been implicated in LTP maintenance. We find that synthesis of AMPA receptor subunits is increased three hours after LTP induction: this effect on the synthesis of the AMPA receptor is blocked by inhibitors of PKA and of transcription. Our results support the idea of a postsynaptic mechanism maintaining late-phase LTP, in which AMPA receptor synthesis is increased as a result of PKA-dependent gene transcription.
Suggested Citation
Asha Nayak & Devon J. Zastrow & Ronald Lickteig & Nancy R. Zahniser & Michael D. Browning, 1998.
"Maintenance of late-phase LTP is accompanied by PKA-dependent increase in AMPA receptor synthesis,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6694), pages 680-683, August.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:394:y:1998:i:6694:d:10.1038_29305
DOI: 10.1038/29305
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:394:y:1998:i:6694:d:10.1038_29305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.