IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v394y1998i6691d10.1038_28596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence from the asymmetry of fast-spreading ridges that the axial topographic high is due to extensional stresses

Author

Listed:
  • Michael A. Eberle

    (Brown University
    Faculté des Sciences)

  • Donald W. Forsyth

    (Brown University)

Abstract

Along fast-spreading mid-ocean ridges such as the East Pacific Rise, there is an axial topographic high, 5–20 km wide, which stands 200–400 m above the background slope caused by thermally induced seafloor subsidence. There are also smaller topographic lows flanking the axial high along most of the East Pacific Rise from 20° S to 15° N. The existence of these lows is predicted by models of the origin of the axial high. One model postulates that the axial high is created by buoyant uplift from a narrow zone ofconcentrated partial melt extending tens of kilometres down into the mantle1,2,3,4. Another model requires no such buoyant zone, suggesting instead that the axial high is generated by dynamic, extensional stresses in the lithosphere and shallow asthenosphere5. Here we show that the observed asymmetry of the flanking lows can be used to distinguish between these two proposed mechanisms. Although either model can be adapted to match the asymmetry on individual profiles, the along-axis variation in degree of symmetry favours the model of dynamic, extensional stresses for the origin of the axial high and its flanking lows.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael A. Eberle & Donald W. Forsyth, 1998. "Evidence from the asymmetry of fast-spreading ridges that the axial topographic high is due to extensional stresses," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6691), pages 360-363, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:394:y:1998:i:6691:d:10.1038_28596
    DOI: 10.1038/28596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/28596
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/28596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:394:y:1998:i:6691:d:10.1038_28596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.