Author
Listed:
- W. Richard Bowen
(Biochemical Engineering Group, Centre for Complex Fluids Processing, University of Wales Swansea)
- Adel O. Sharif
(Biochemical Engineering Group, Centre for Complex Fluids Processing, University of Wales Swansea)
Abstract
The existence of long-range attractive electrostatic forces between particles of like charge is one of the great current controversies ofcolloid science. The established theory (Derjaguin–Landau–Vervey–Overbeek; DLVO) of colloidal interactions predicts that an isolated pair of like-charged colloidal spheres in an electrolyte should experience a purely repulsive screened electrostatic (coulombic) interaction1,2. Direct measurements of such interactions have shown quantitative agreement with DLVO theory3,4,5. Recent experiments, however, provide evidence that the effective interparticle potential can have a long-range attractive component in more concentrated suspensions6,7 and for particles confined by charged glass walls3,5,8,9,10. It is apparent that the long-range attraction in concentrated systems is due to multi-body interactions and may have a similar explanation to the attraction observed for otherwise confined colloids. Theoretical explanations have been proposed11,12,13 but remain the subject of controversy14,15. Here we present a quantitative theoretical explanation of these attractive forces between confined colloidal particles, based on direct solutions of the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation for two like-charged spheres confined in a cylindrical charged pore. The calculations show that the attraction may be explained by the redistribution of the electric double layers of ions and counterions in solution around the spheres, owing to the presence of the wall; there is thus no need to revise the established concepts underlying theories of colloidal interactions.
Suggested Citation
W. Richard Bowen & Adel O. Sharif, 1998.
"Long-range electrostatic attraction between like-charge spheres in a charged pore,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6686), pages 663-665, June.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:393:y:1998:i:6686:d:10.1038_31418
DOI: 10.1038/31418
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:393:y:1998:i:6686:d:10.1038_31418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.