Author
Listed:
- A. N. Ramaprakash
(Palomar Observatory 105-24, California Institute of Technology
Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics)
- S. R. Kulkarni
(Palomar Observatory 105-24, California Institute of Technology)
- D. A. Frail
(National Radio Astronomy Observatory)
- C. Koresko
(Palomar Observatory 105-24, California Institute of Technology)
- M. Kuchner
(Palomar Observatory 105-24, California Institute of Technology)
- R. Goodrich
(W. M. Keck Observatory, 65-1120 Mamalahoa Highway)
- G. Neugebauer
(Palomar Observatory 105-24, California Institute of Technology)
- T. Murphy
(Palomar Observatory 105-24, California Institute of Technology)
- S. Eikenberry
(Palomar Observatory 105-24, California Institute of Technology)
- J. S. Bloom
(Palomar Observatory 105-24, California Institute of Technology)
- S. G. Djorgovski
(Palomar Observatory 105-24, California Institute of Technology)
- E. Waxman
(Institute for Advanced Study)
- F. Frontera
(Istituto Tecn. Studio Rad. Extraterrestri, CNR, via Gobetti 101
Universit Ferrara)
- M. Feroci
(Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale, CNR, via Fosso del Cavaliere)
- L. Nicastro
(Istituto Fisica Cosmica App. Info., CNR, via U. La Malfa 153)
Abstract
The discovery of fading but relatively long-lived X-ray emission1 accompanying γ-ray bursts has revolutionized the study of these objects. This ‘afterglow’ is most easily explained by models2,3,4 similar to those describing supernovae, but with relativistic ejecta. And as with supernovae, afterglow measurements should in principle provide important constraints on burst properties, permitting, for example, estimates of the amount of energy released, the geometry of the emitting surface and the density of the ambient medium. Here we report infrared observations of the fading optical transient5 associated with the burst of 14 December 1997 (GRB971214; ref. 6). We detect a ‘break’ in the broad-band spectrum, as predicted by afterglow models, which constrains the total energy in the burst to be >1051 erg. Combining the fluence of optical afterglow with the redshift (z = 3.42; ref. 7), we estimate that the energy released in the afterglow alone was 2× 1051 erg. Estimates of afterglow energetics are less likely to be subject to geometric effects—such as beaming—that render uncertain estimates of the total burst energy, but it nevertheless appears from our measurements that γ-ray bursts may be much more energetic than the 1051 erg usually assumed.
Suggested Citation
A. N. Ramaprakash & S. R. Kulkarni & D. A. Frail & C. Koresko & M. Kuchner & R. Goodrich & G. Neugebauer & T. Murphy & S. Eikenberry & J. S. Bloom & S. G. Djorgovski & E. Waxman & F. Frontera & M. Fer, 1998.
"The energetic afterglow of the γ-ray burst of 14 December 1997,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6680), pages 43-46, May.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:393:y:1998:i:6680:d:10.1038_29941
DOI: 10.1038/29941
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:393:y:1998:i:6680:d:10.1038_29941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.