IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v392y1998i6674d10.1038_32810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contradictions of slate formation resolved?

Author

Listed:
  • Ben A. van der Pluijm

    (University of Michigan)

  • Nei-Che Ho

    (University of Michigan)

  • Donald R. Peacor

    (University of Michigan)

  • Richard J. Merriman

    (British Geological Survey)

Abstract

Slate is formed from clay-rich mud in response to tectonic stress. It has been studied for more than 150 years and was among the first geological features to be analysed on the microscopic scale1. Early observations2 recognized the importance of micaceous minerals to the splitting of slate into thin sheets, whereas current hypotheses for slate formation emphasize either mechanical processes (grain rotation and grain kinking) or chemical processes (grain dissolution and new growth). Despite a vast body of work, no single scenario incorporates these seemingly contradictory mechanisms3,4. Here we offer a unifying model that views the mechanisms as a function of the combined thermal and strain energy of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben A. van der Pluijm & Nei-Che Ho & Donald R. Peacor & Richard J. Merriman, 1998. "Contradictions of slate formation resolved?," Nature, Nature, vol. 392(6674), pages 348-348, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:392:y:1998:i:6674:d:10.1038_32810
    DOI: 10.1038/32810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/32810
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/32810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:392:y:1998:i:6674:d:10.1038_32810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.