IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v392y1998i6673d10.1038_32603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence against turbulent and canopy-like magnetic fields in the solar chromosphere

Author

Listed:
  • Egidio Landi Degl'Innocenti

    (Universitá di Firenze)

Abstract

Measurements of the degree of polarization of light in the spectral lines emitted by gas near the Sun's limb (its outer edge) can be used to investigate the electron densities and magnetic field strengths in the solar atmosphere; these quantities are important for determining the balance and transport of energy through the Sun's atmosphere. Recent measurements1,2 revealed a surprising degree of polarization in the sodium doublet; these observations have remained an enigma. Here I report a mechanism that may explain these observations, in which it is assumed that the populations of the magnetic sublevels of the electronic ground state of the sodium atom are not equal: this leads to ground-level atomic polarization. This mechanism explains very well the observed line shapes, and implies that depolarization does not occur in the solar chromosphere, which would seem to rule out the existence of turbulent magnetic fields and of horizontal, canopy-like fields stronger than∼0.01 G. This is difficult to understand, because there is substantial evidence from othertypes of observation for both types of field3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. There are obviously aspects of the Sun's atmosphere that remain very poorly understood.

Suggested Citation

  • Egidio Landi Degl'Innocenti, 1998. "Evidence against turbulent and canopy-like magnetic fields in the solar chromosphere," Nature, Nature, vol. 392(6673), pages 256-258, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:392:y:1998:i:6673:d:10.1038_32603
    DOI: 10.1038/32603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/32603
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/32603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:392:y:1998:i:6673:d:10.1038_32603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.