IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v391y1998i6668d10.1038_35630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neural noise limitations on infant visual sensitivity

Author

Listed:
  • Ann M. Skoczenski

    (Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute)

  • Anthony M. Norcia

    (Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute)

Abstract

Visual contrast sensitivity is poor in newborn human infants, but improves rapidly to approach adult levels by 8 months of age1,2,3,4,5. During this period, infant sensitivity can be limited by physical factors affecting photon capture, such as eye size and photoreceptor density6,7. Here we show that infant visual sensitivity is also limited by high levels of noise in the neural transduction process. Using a non-invasive electrophysiological measurement8,9,10 and a visual noise titration technique11, we have found that intrinsic neural noise in neonates is approximately nine times higher than in adults. As intrinsic neural noise decreases during infancy, contrast sensitivity improves proportionally, suggesting that neural noise places critical limits on contrast sensitivity throughout development. Moreover, contrast gain control12, an inhibitory process that adjusts visual responses to changing stimulation, is in place and operating in infants as young as 6 weeks of age, in spite of high levels of neural noise and significant immaturities in contrast sensitivity. The contrast gain control that we observed in human neonates may serve as a building block for more complex forms of visual inhibition, which develop later in infancy13.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann M. Skoczenski & Anthony M. Norcia, 1998. "Neural noise limitations on infant visual sensitivity," Nature, Nature, vol. 391(6668), pages 697-700, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:391:y:1998:i:6668:d:10.1038_35630
    DOI: 10.1038/35630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35630
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:391:y:1998:i:6668:d:10.1038_35630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.