IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v391y1998i6664d10.1038_34646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Goldin-Meadow

    (University of Chicago)

  • Carolyn Mylander

    (University of Chicago)

Abstract

Deaf children whose access to usable conventional linguistic input, signed or spoken, is severely limited nevertheless use gesture to communicate1,2,3. These gestures resemble natural language in that they are structured at the level both of sentence4 and of word5. Although the inclination to use gesture may be traceable to the fact that the deaf children's hearing parents, like all speakers, gesture as they talk6, the children themselves are responsible for introducing language-like structure into their gestures7. We have explored the robustness of this phenomenon by observing deaf children of hearing parents in two cultures, an American and a Chinese culture, that differ in their child-rearing practices8,9,10,11,12 and in the way gesture is used in relation to speech13. The spontaneous sign systems developed in these cultures shared a number of structural similarities: patterned production and deletion of semantic elements in the surface structure of a sentence; patterned ordering of those elements within the sentence; and concatenation of propositions within a sentence. These striking similarities offer critical empirical input towards resolving the ongoing debate about the ‘innateness’ of language in human infants14,15,16.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Goldin-Meadow & Carolyn Mylander, 1998. "Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures," Nature, Nature, vol. 391(6664), pages 279-281, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:391:y:1998:i:6664:d:10.1038_34646
    DOI: 10.1038/34646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/34646
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/34646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:391:y:1998:i:6664:d:10.1038_34646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.