IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v391y1998i6664d10.1038_34569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How molecular motors work in muscle

Author

Listed:
  • Joe Howard

    (University of Washington)

Abstract

Howard replies — Huxley points out that there is a discrepancy between recent mechanical recordings from single myosin molecules in vitro and earlier mechanical measurements from muscle fibres in vivo: the single-molecule recordings indicate a working distance and maximum duty ratio of 4-6 nm and 10-20%, respectively, only about half the values deduced from the fibrestudies. Although it is possible that technical limitations, for example misorientated heads, make the single-molecule recordings suspect, I argued in my ReviewArticle1 that the discrepancy might be only an apparent one. In particular, the smaller working distance does conform to many of the results from muscle, and the lower duty ratio can even provide a more satisfactory explanation for some of the experiments with muscle fibres. Huxley challenges this view by discussing three additional observations from fibres. But I believe that these too are mainly consistent with the smaller working stroke and duty ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Howard, 1998. "How molecular motors work in muscle," Nature, Nature, vol. 391(6664), pages 239-240, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:391:y:1998:i:6664:d:10.1038_34569
    DOI: 10.1038/34569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/34569
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/34569?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:391:y:1998:i:6664:d:10.1038_34569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.