Author
Listed:
- S. Emerson
(School of Oceanography, University of Washington)
- P. Quay
(School of Oceanography, University of Washington)
- D. Karl
(University of Hawaii)
- C. Winn
(University of Hawaii)
- L. Tupas
(University of Hawaii)
- M. Landry
(University of Hawaii)
Abstract
The flux of biologically produced organic carbon from the euphotic zone of the ocean to the deep waters below—the ‘biological organic carbon pump’—is one of the main controls on the carbon dioxide partial pressure in the atmosphere1. Accurate determination of this flux is therefore critically important for understanding the global carbon cycle and its response to climate change. Our goal is to assess how accurately the biological organic carbon pump can be determined at a single location and to constrain estimates of the global value. As there are no standards against which such environmental fluxes can be measured, we assess accuracy by comparing results from three independent experimental approaches for measuring the net annual export of organic carbon from the euphotic zone in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean near Hawaii. Mass balances of dissolved oxygen, inorganic carbon and organic carbon yield estimates of the organic carbon export flux of 2.7 ± 1.7, 1.6 ± 0.9 and 2.0 ± 0.9 mol C m−2 yr−1, respectively. These three estimates are not significantly different, and establish the present analytically attainable accuracy at this location to be about ±50%. If 2.0 mol C m−2 yr−1 is typical of the organic carbon export flux in the subtropical ocean, then this vast region, often considered to be a biological desert, may be responsible for up to half of the global-ocean biological organic carbon pump.
Suggested Citation
S. Emerson & P. Quay & D. Karl & C. Winn & L. Tupas & M. Landry, 1997.
"Experimental determination of the organic carbon flux from open-ocean surface waters,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 389(6654), pages 951-954, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:389:y:1997:i:6654:d:10.1038_40111
DOI: 10.1038/40111
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:389:y:1997:i:6654:d:10.1038_40111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.