IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v388y1997i6640d10.1038_41073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The age of the Popigai impact event and its relation to events at the Eocene/Oligocene boundary

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Bottomley

    (*Canadian Union College, College Heights)

  • Richard Grieve

    (†Geological Survey of Canada)

  • Derek York

    (University of Toronto)

  • Victor Masaitis

    (§Karpinsky Geological Institute)

Abstract

Ages ranging from the Late Cretaceous (∼65 Myr) to the Oligocene (∼29 Myr) have been reported for the 100-km-diameter Popigai impact structure1,2 on the Anabar shield, central Siberia. These ages3,4,5,6,7,8 overlap the timing of several possible impact-related features, including the Cretaceous/Tertiary and Eocene/Oligocene stratigraphic boundaries, the North American tektites9, and the recently reported occurrences of an iridium anomaly and shocked quartz in Late Eocene deposits in northern Italy10. Here we report age determinations of several Popigai impact melt rocks using the 40Ar–39Ar step heating technique to constrain the age of the impact event. Our results are consistent with a Late Eocene impact age of 35.7± 0.2 Myr (2σ)—coincident in time with the impact deposits found in Italy. As this age is also similar to that of the North American tektites, which have been associated with the Chesapeake Bay impact structure in the eastern United States11,12,13, there seem to have been at least two large and essentially contemporaneous impacts during the Late Eocene.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Bottomley & Richard Grieve & Derek York & Victor Masaitis, 1997. "The age of the Popigai impact event and its relation to events at the Eocene/Oligocene boundary," Nature, Nature, vol. 388(6640), pages 365-368, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:388:y:1997:i:6640:d:10.1038_41073
    DOI: 10.1038/41073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/41073
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/41073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:388:y:1997:i:6640:d:10.1038_41073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.