Author
Listed:
- T. Galama
(University of Amsterdam
Centre for High Energy Astrophysics)
- P. J. Groot
(University of Amsterdam
Centre for High Energy Astrophysics)
- J. van Paradijs
(University of Amsterdam
Centre for High Energy Astrophysics
University of Alabama in Huntsville)
- C. Kouveliotou
(Universities Space Research Association
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center)
- C. Robinson
(Universities Space Research Association
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center)
- G. J. Fishman
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center)
- C. A. Meegan
(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center)
- K. C. Sahu
(Space Telescope Science Institute)
- M. Livio
(Space Telescope Science Institute)
- L. Petro
(Space Telescope Science Institute)
- F. D. Macchetto
(Space Telescope Science Institute)
- J. Heise
(SRON Laboratory for Space Research)
- J. in't Zand
(SRON Laboratory for Space Research)
- R. G. Strom
(University of Amsterdam
Netherlands Foundation for Research in Astronomy)
- J. Telting
(Isaac Newton Group)
- R. G. M. Rutten
(Isaac Newton Group)
- M. Pettini
(Royal Greenwich Observatory)
- N. Tanvir
(Institute of Astronomy)
- J. Bloom
(Institute of Astronomy)
Abstract
The origin of γ-ray bursts has been one of the great unsolved mysteries in high-energy astrophysics for almost 30 years. The recent discovery of fading sources at X-ray1 and optical 2,3 wavelengths coincident with the location of the γ-ray burst GRB970228 therefore provides an unprecedented opportunity to probe the nature of these high-energy events. The optical counterpart appears to be a transient point source embedded in a region of extended nebulosity 3–6, the latter having been tentatively identified as a high-redshift galaxy3. This would seem to favour models that place γ-ray bursts at cosmological distances, although a range of mechanisms for producing the bursts is still allowed. A crucial piece of information for distinguishing between such models is how the brightness of the optical counterpart evolves with time. Here we re-evaluate the existing photometry of the optical counterpart of GRB970228 to construct an optical light curve for the transient event. We find that between 21 hours and six days after the burst, the R-band brightness decreased by a factor of ∼40, with any subsequent decrease in brightness occurring at a much slower rate. As the point source faded, it also became redder. The initial behaviour of the source appears to be consistent with the 'fireball' model7, but the subsequent decrease in the rate of fading may prove harder to explain.
Suggested Citation
T. Galama & P. J. Groot & J. van Paradijs & C. Kouveliotou & C. Robinson & G. J. Fishman & C. A. Meegan & K. C. Sahu & M. Livio & L. Petro & F. D. Macchetto & J. Heise & J. in't Zand & R. G. Strom & J, 1997.
"The decay of optical emission from the γ-ray burst GRB970228,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6632), pages 479-481, May.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nature:v:387:y:1997:i:6632:d:10.1038_387479a0
DOI: 10.1038/387479a0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:387:y:1997:i:6632:d:10.1038_387479a0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.