IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v387y1997i6630d10.1038_387261a0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Absence of a magnetic-field signature in plasma-wave observations at Callisto

Author

Listed:
  • D. A. Gurnett

    (University of Iowa)

  • W. S. Kurth

    (University of Iowa)

  • A Roux

    (Université Versailles Saint Quentin)

  • S. J. Bolton

    (Jet Propulsion Laboratory)

Abstract

The galilean moons of Jupiter are substantial bodies—three of them are larger than the Earth's Moon, and one is larger than Mercury—yet little has been known about them until very recently. The discovery of a magnetosphere1 and magnetic field2 associated with Ganymede was surprising, and raised the possibility that other galilean satellites, particularly Callisto (which is the second largest after Ganymede), also might have an internally generated magnetic field. Here we report observations of plasma waves around Callisto, detected during the recent fly-by of the Galileo spacecraft. The nature of the plasma waves indicates that Callisto, unlike Ganymede, does not have a magnetosphere or an internal magnetic field. The electron density near Callisto, however, is substantially higher than that in Jupiter's magnetosphere at this orbital radius, indicating that Callisto is a significant source of locally generated plasma. This plasma most probably comes from a tenuous atmosphere around Callisto, which may be similar to the hydrogen cloud around Ganymede, as the electron densities are somewhat comparable.

Suggested Citation

  • D. A. Gurnett & W. S. Kurth & A Roux & S. J. Bolton, 1997. "Absence of a magnetic-field signature in plasma-wave observations at Callisto," Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6630), pages 261-262, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:387:y:1997:i:6630:d:10.1038_387261a0
    DOI: 10.1038/387261a0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/387261a0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/387261a0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:387:y:1997:i:6630:d:10.1038_387261a0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.