IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v386y1997i6627d10.1038_386827a0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between subjective effects of cocaine and dopamine transporter occupancy

Author

Listed:
  • N. D. Volkow

    (Brookhaven National Laboratory
    State University of New York at Stony Brook)

  • G.-J. Wang

    (Brookhaven National Laboratory)

  • M. W. Fischman

    (Columbia University)

  • R. W. Foltin

    (Columbia University)

  • J. S. Fowler

    (Brookhaven National Laboratory)

  • N. N. Abumrad

    (Northshore University Hospital)

  • S. Vitkun

    (State University of New York at Stony Brook)

  • J. Logan

    (Brookhaven National Laboratory)

  • S. J. Gatley

    (Brookhaven National Laboratory)

  • N. Pappas

    (Brookhaven National Laboratory)

  • R. Hitzemann

    (State University of New York at Stony Brook)

  • C. E. Shea

    (Brookhaven National Laboratory)

Abstract

Cocaine is believed to work by blocking the dopamine transporter (DAT) and thereby increasing the availability of free dopamine within the brain1–4. Although this concept is central to current cocaine research and to treatment development, a direct relationship between DAT blockade and the subjective effects of cocaine has not been demonstrated in humans. We have used positron emission tomography to determine what level of DAT occupancy is required to produce a subjective 'high' in human volunteers who regularly abuse cocaine. We report here that intravenous cocaine at doses commonly abused by humans (0.3–0.6 mg kg−1) blocked between 60 and 77% of DAT sites in these subjects. The magnitude of the self-reported high was correlated with the degree of DAT occupancy, and at least 47% of the transporters had to be blocked for subjects to perceive cocaine's effects. Furthermore, the time course for the high paralleled that of cocaine concentration within the striatum, a brain region implicated in the control of motivation and reward. This is the first demonstration in humans that the doses used by cocaine abusers lead to significant blockade of DAT, and that this blockade is associated with the subjective effects of cocaine. Although these findings provide justification to target the DAT for medication development they suggest that for drugs to be effective in blocking cocaine's effects they would have to be given at doses that achieve almost complete DAT occupancy.

Suggested Citation

  • N. D. Volkow & G.-J. Wang & M. W. Fischman & R. W. Foltin & J. S. Fowler & N. N. Abumrad & S. Vitkun & J. Logan & S. J. Gatley & N. Pappas & R. Hitzemann & C. E. Shea, 1997. "Relationship between subjective effects of cocaine and dopamine transporter occupancy," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6627), pages 827-830, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:386:y:1997:i:6627:d:10.1038_386827a0
    DOI: 10.1038/386827a0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/386827a0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/386827a0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:386:y:1997:i:6627:d:10.1038_386827a0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.