IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v7y2024i12d10.1038_s41893-024-01447-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Involving citizens in monitoring the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Finn Danielsen

    (Nordic Foundation for Development and Ecology (NORDECO))

  • Natasha Ali

    (UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC))

  • Herizo T. Andrianandrasana

    (University of Warwick)

  • Andrea Baquero

    (UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC))

  • Umai Basilius

    (Palau Conservation Society)

  • Pedro Araujo Lima Constantino

    (Conservação e Uso da Fauna da Amazônia)

  • Katherine Despot-Belmonte

    (UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC))

  • Per Ole Frederiksen
  • Maxim Isaac

    (University of Copenhagen)

  • PâviâraK Jakobsen

    (Qeqertalik Municipality)

  • Helen Klimmek

    (UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC))

  • Abisha Mapendembe

    (UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC))

  • Han Meng

    (UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre)

  • Dietrich Schmidt-Vogt

    (University of Freiburg)

  • Seak Sophat

    (Royal University of Phnom Penh)

  • Rodion Sulyandziga

    (Center for Support of Indigenous Peoples of the North)

  • Anne L. S. Virnig

    (United Nations Development Programme)

  • Di Zhang

    (United Nations Development Programme)

  • Neil D. Burgess

    (UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)
    University of Copenhagen
    University of Cambridge)

Abstract

The Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) and its monitoring framework aims to reverse the decline of nature. The GBF tasks governments to report progress towards 23 targets and four goals but also “invites Parties and relevant organizations to support community-based monitoring and information systems and citizen science” to improve information for decision-making and build support for conservation efforts throughout society. We assessed how Indigenous Peoples, local communities and citizen scientists and professional scientists can help monitor the GBF. Of the 365 indicators of the GBF monitoring framework, 110 (30%) can involve Indigenous Peoples, local communities and citizen scientists in community-based monitoring programmes, 185 (51%) could benefit from citizen involvement in data collection and 180 (49%) require scientists and governmental statistical organizations. A smaller proportion of indicators for GBF targets are amenable to citizen monitoring than for the previous Aichi targets or other multilateral environment agreements—largely because 196 GBF indicators are analytically complex (54%) and 175 require legislative overview (48%). Greater involvement of citizens in the GBF would increase societal engagement in international agreements, harness knowledge from those living close to nature to fill data gaps and enhance local to national decision-making based on improved information, leading to better conservation actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Finn Danielsen & Natasha Ali & Herizo T. Andrianandrasana & Andrea Baquero & Umai Basilius & Pedro Araujo Lima Constantino & Katherine Despot-Belmonte & Per Ole Frederiksen & Maxim Isaac & PâviâraK Ja, 2024. "Involving citizens in monitoring the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(12), pages 1730-1739, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:7:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1038_s41893-024-01447-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-024-01447-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01447-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-024-01447-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:7:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1038_s41893-024-01447-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.