IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v7y2024i11d10.1038_s41893-024-01456-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outcomes and policy focus of environmental litigation in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher M. Rea

    (Brown University
    Brown University
    Brown University)

  • Nikolas E. Merten

    (The Ohio State University)

  • Casey J. Rife

    (The Ohio State University)

Abstract

Environmental policy in the United States is heavily influenced by civil litigation, which is used by government, environmental groups and industry to shape environmental protections. These disputes impact national and global environmental policy, but there is limited knowledge about outcomes for pro- and anti-regulatory plaintiffs or which areas of environmental policy are focused on by different plaintiffs. Drawing on 25,775 environmental civil suits and 4,142 judicial decisions filed in federal district courts between 1988 and 2022, we show that pro-regulatory plaintiffs tend to have a higher win rate than anti-regulatory ones, that federal enforcement litigation focuses overwhelmingly on pollution and waste-related conflicts, that environmental advocacy groups focus heavily on conservation-related conflicts and that climate and environmental justice-related themes are rarely discussed in environmental legal decisions. The inequality in legal advocacy that we document may help to explain areas of strength and weakness in US environmental policy, with implications for environmental justice and global sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher M. Rea & Nikolas E. Merten & Casey J. Rife, 2024. "Outcomes and policy focus of environmental litigation in the United States," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1469-1480, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:7:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1038_s41893-024-01456-x
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-024-01456-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01456-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-024-01456-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabrina McCormick & Robert L. Glicksman & Samuel J. Simmens & LeRoy Paddock & Daniel Kim & Brittany Whited, 2018. "Strategies in and outcomes of climate change litigation in the United States," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(9), pages 829-833, September.
    2. Joana Setzer & Lisa C. Vanhala, 2019. "Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), May.
    3. Broussard, Shorna R. & Whitaker, Bianca D., 2009. "The Magna Charta of Environmental Legislation: A historical look at 30Â years of NEPA-Forest Service Litigation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 148-154, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Misato Sato & Glen Gostlow & Catherine Higham & Joana Setzer & Frank Venmans, 2024. "Impacts of climate litigation on firm value," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1461-1468, November.
    2. Jasmina Nedevska, 2021. "An Attack on the Separation of Powers? Strategic Climate Litigation in the Eyes of U.S. Judges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-7, July.
    3. Agnieszka Szpak, 2020. "Arctic Athabaskan Council’s petition to the Inter-American Commission on human rights and climate change—business as usual or a breakthrough?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1575-1593, October.
    4. Floress, Kristin & Vokoun, Melinda & Huff, Emily Silver & Baker, Melissa, 2019. "Public perceptions of county, state, and national forest management in Wisconsin, USA," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 110-120.
    5. Shaikh Eskander & Sam Fankhauser & Joana Setzer, 2021. "Global Lessons from Climate Change Legislation and Litigation," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 44-82.
    6. Ryan Gunderson & Claiton Fyock, 2022. "Are fossil fuel CEOs responsible for climate change? Social structure and criminal law approaches to climate litigation," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 378-385, June.
    7. Abrams, Jesse, 2019. "The emergence of network governance in U.S. National Forest Administration: Causal factors and propositions for future research," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Louis J. Kotzé & Benoit Mayer & Harro van Asselt & Joana Setzer & Frank Biermann & Nicolas Celis & Sam Adelman & Bridget Lewis & Amanda Kennedy & Helen Arling & Birgit Peters, 2024. "Courts, climate litigation and the evolution of earth system law," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(1), pages 5-22, February.
    9. Angela Maria D’Uggento & Alfonso Piscitelli & Nunziata Ribecco & Germana Scepi, 2023. "Perceived climate change risk and global green activism among young people," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(4), pages 1167-1195, October.
    10. Kovács, Anna & Luckner, Katharina & Sekuła, Anna & Kantorowicz, Jarosław, 2024. "Beyond courts: Does strategic litigation affect climate change policy support?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Kline, Jeffrey D. & Mazzotta, Marisa J. & Spies, Thomas A. & Harmon, Mark E., 2013. "Applying the Ecosystem Services Concept to Public Land Management," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Dulak, Thomas & Gnabo, Jean-Yves, 2024. "Climate litigation and financial markets: A disciplinary effect?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    13. Liliana Lizarazo-Rodriguez, 2021. "The UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and the Greening of Human Rights Litigation: Fishing in Fragmented Waters?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, September.
    14. Dietz, Simon & Gardiner, Dan & Jahn, Valentin & Noels, Jolien, 2021. "How ambitious are oil and gas companies’ climate goals?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112536, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Olukorede Adewole, 2023. "CSR–brand relationship, brand positioning, and investment risks driven towards climate change mitigation and next perspectives emerging from: “Litigation, projections, pathway, and models”," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-53, January.
    16. Henry Jiménez Guanipa & Natalia Castro Niño & Wilfredo Robayo Galvis, 2020. "Emergencia climática : Prospectiva 2030 : XXI Jornadas de Derecho Constitucional. Constitucionalismo en transformación. Prospectiva 2030," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1273, March.
    17. Hermine Van Coppenolle & Mathieu Blondeel & Thijs Van de Graaf, 2023. "Reframing the climate debate: The origins and diffusion of net zero pledges," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 48-60, February.
    18. Dana R. Fisher & Sohana Nasrin, 2021. "Climate activism and its effects," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), January.
    19. Seline Keller & Basil Bornemann, 2021. "New Climate Activism between Politics and Law: Analyzing the Strategy of the KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 124-134.
    20. Daniel Rosenbloom & Adrian Rinscheid, 2020. "Deliberate decline: An emerging frontier for the study and practice of decarbonization," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(6), November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:7:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1038_s41893-024-01456-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.