IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v6y2023i8d10.1038_s41893-023-01111-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decarbonization efforts hindered by China’s slow progress on electricity market reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Yu

    (Tsinghua University
    Shanghai Qi Zhi Institute)

  • Jianxiao Wang

    (Peking University
    Peking University Changsha Institute for Computing and Digital Economy)

  • Qixin Chen

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Johannes Urpelainen

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Qingguo Ding

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Shuo Liu

    (Beijing Power Exchange Center)

  • Bing Zhang

    (Nanjing University)

Abstract

The reform of China’s electricity generation to move from a centrally planned operation (CPO) to a market-based system has progressed slowly over the past decade. The slow reform pace hindered the market-share reallocation over power plants with divergent carbon intensity and thus locked the carbon trajectory of China’s power sector. Here we analyse the effects of the delayed electricity market reform in terms of CO2 emissions. Constrained by a sequence of unique fairness regulations, a multi-timescale dispatch model is developed to quantify the CPO-induced CO2 emissions from China’s power sector. We find that continuing to generate electricity through the CPO has produced an additional 3 GtCO2 emissions over 2011–2019, an amount equivalent to the total emissions of India, which is the world’s fourth-largest carbon emitter. In some provinces, the level of extra emissions accounts for up to 20% of the annual power-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We find that national level GHG emissions have increased because the CPO over-allocated ~30% of the market shares of electricity generation to high-carbon power plants, including those in provinces that have been implementing energy-saving operation policies. In addition, we find the China’s growing investment in generation capacity has exacerbated the GHG emissions impact of the CPO, whereas China’s investment in fuel efficiency improvement has reduced CPO-related emissions by over 13%. Our discoveries manifest that the economic institution and its transition in the energy sector can substantially impact the GHG trajectory and thus play a critical role of the sustainability of human society.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Yu & Jianxiao Wang & Qixin Chen & Johannes Urpelainen & Qingguo Ding & Shuo Liu & Bing Zhang, 2023. "Decarbonization efforts hindered by China’s slow progress on electricity market reforms," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(8), pages 1006-1015, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:6:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1038_s41893-023-01111-x
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01111-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-023-01111-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-023-01111-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Zhaoyuan & Chen, Zili & Wang, Congyi & Zhou, Ming & Wang, Jianxiao & Chen, Lin, 2024. "Unlocking the potential of rooftop solar panels: An incentive rate structure design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Yi, Yuxin & Zhang, Liming & Du, Lei & Sun, Helin, 2024. "Cross-regional integration of renewable energy and corporate carbon emissions: Evidence from China's cross-regional surplus renewable energy spot trading pilot," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Cao, Jing & Ho, Mun S. & Ma, Rong & Zhang, Yu, 2024. "Transition from plan to market: Imperfect regulations in the electricity sector of China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 509-533.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:6:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1038_s41893-023-01111-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.