IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v3y2020i8d10.1038_s41893-020-0527-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science sidelined in approval of Australia’s largest coal mine

Author

Listed:
  • M. J. Currell

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University)

  • D. J. Irvine

    (Flinders University)

  • A. D. Werner

    (Flinders University)

  • C. McGrath

    (University of Queensland)

Abstract

State and federal governments in Australia recently approved water management plans for one of the largest coal mines ever proposed. This comes as the role of coal in the world’s future energy mix is being seriously questioned, and global concern over the climate and water implications of further fossil fuel development. Despite repeated advice from multiple independent scientists, governments did not compel the mining company to conduct the investigations required to determine its risks to important nearby groundwater-dependent ecosystems, leaving open the prospect of irreversible ecological and cultural damage. Here we show how scientific advice provided to decision makers was repeatedly ignored or dismissed, while scientists and agencies were subjected to political pressure. We argue that this echoes other examples of scientific evidence being ignored where findings clash with political or economic objectives, and warrants urgent review of decision-making processes for developments with major environmental consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • M. J. Currell & D. J. Irvine & A. D. Werner & C. McGrath, 2020. "Science sidelined in approval of Australia’s largest coal mine," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 644-649, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:3:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1038_s41893-020-0527-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-0527-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-020-0527-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-020-0527-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:3:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1038_s41893-020-0527-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.