IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v3y2020i5d10.1038_s41893-020-0495-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability analysis of French dietary guidelines using multiple criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot

    (Université Paris 13, CRESS – EREN (Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team) INSERM, INRA, CNAM)

  • Dan Chaltiel

    (Université Paris 13, CRESS – EREN (Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team) INSERM, INRA, CNAM)

  • Juhui Wang

    (UMR PNCA, AgroParisTech, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Philippe Pointereau

    (Solagro)

  • Brigitte Langevin

    (Solagro)

  • Benjamin Allès

    (Université Paris 13, CRESS – EREN (Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team) INSERM, INRA, CNAM)

  • Pauline Rebouillat

    (Université Paris 13, CRESS – EREN (Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team) INSERM, INRA, CNAM)

  • Denis Lairon

    (Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, INRA, C2VN)

  • Rodolphe Vidal

    (Institut Technique de l’Agriculture Biologique)

  • François Mariotti

    (UMR PNCA, AgroParisTech, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Manon Egnell

    (Université Paris 13, CRESS – EREN (Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team) INSERM, INRA, CNAM)

  • Mathilde Touvier

    (Université Paris 13, CRESS – EREN (Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team) INSERM, INRA, CNAM)

  • Chantal Julia

    (Université Paris 13, CRESS – EREN (Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team) INSERM, INRA, CNAM
    Hôpital Avicenne)

  • Julia Baudry

    (Université Paris 13, CRESS – EREN (Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team) INSERM, INRA, CNAM)

  • Serge Hercberg

    (Université Paris 13, CRESS – EREN (Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team) INSERM, INRA, CNAM
    Hôpital Avicenne)

Abstract

Sustainability is now accounted for in certain food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG). In 2017, the French FBDG were updated to incorporate environmental preservation. We conducted a multi-indicator evaluation of the 2001 and 2017 FBDG, based on data from 28,340 participants in the NutriNet-Santé cohort who completed an organic food frequency questionnaire. Indicators related to nutrition, environment (three indicators and the synthetic partial ReCiPe (pReCiPe) score) and economy were used, to distinguish organic and conventional farming systems. To estimate compliance with the 2001 and 2017 FBDG, we used two validated adherence scores (PNNS-GS1 and PNNS-GS2, respectively). We estimated numbers of averted deaths by adhering to the FBDG using a competing risk assessment model. Higher adherence to the 2017 guidelines was related to higher plant-based diet, cost and deaths averted and lower energy intake, synthetic environmental score and exposure to certain pesticides. Overall, larger differences between lowest and highest PNNS-GS2 were observed than between lowest and highest PNNS-GS1. Our results suggest that the 2017 guidelines are in line overall with the multiple dimensions of diet sustainability, including health, although at a slight cost increase. If adopted by a large part of the population, these dietary guidelines might contribute to the prevention of chronic diseases while reducing food-related environmental pressures.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot & Dan Chaltiel & Juhui Wang & Philippe Pointereau & Brigitte Langevin & Benjamin Allès & Pauline Rebouillat & Denis Lairon & Rodolphe Vidal & François Mariotti & Manon Egnell & , 2020. "Sustainability analysis of French dietary guidelines using multiple criteria," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(5), pages 377-385, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:3:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1038_s41893-020-0495-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-0495-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-020-0495-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-020-0495-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:3:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1038_s41893-020-0495-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.