IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v2y2019i3d10.1038_s41893-019-0244-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biocultural approaches to pollinator conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemary Hill

    (CSIRO Land and Water
    James Cook University)

  • Guiomar Nates-Parra

    (Universidad Nacional de Colombia)

  • José Javier G. Quezada-Euán

    (Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan)

  • Damayanti Buchori

    (Bogor Agricultural University)

  • Gretchen LeBuhn

    (San Francisco State University)

  • Marcia M. Maués

    (Embrapa Amazônia Oriental)

  • Petina L. Pert

    (CSIRO Land and Water)

  • Peter K Kwapong

    (University of Cape Coast)

  • Shafqat Saeed

    (Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture)

  • Sara J Breslow

    (University of Washington)

  • Manuela Carneiro da Cunha

    (University of São Paulo
    University of Chicago)

  • Lynn V. Dicks

    (University of East Anglia)

  • Leonardo Galetto

    (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba)

  • Mary Gikungu

    (National Museums of Kenya)

  • Brad G. Howlett

    (The Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Rangahau Ahumara Kai)

  • Vera L. Imperatriz-Fonseca

    (Vale Institute of Technology Sustainable Development
    S. Paulo University)

  • Phil O’B. Lyver

    (Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research)

  • Berta Martín-López

    (Institute for Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research, Leuphana University)

  • Elisa Oteros-Rozas

    (Universidad Pablo de Olavide and FRACTAL Collective)

  • Simon G. Potts

    (School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Reading University)

  • Marie Roué

    (France National Museum of Natural History)

Abstract

Pollinators underpin sustainable livelihoods that link ecosystems, spiritual and cultural values, and customary governance systems with indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) across the world. Biocultural diversity is a shorthand term for this great variety of people–nature interlinkages that have developed over time in specific ecosystems. Biocultural approaches to conservation explicitly build on the conservation practices inherent in sustaining these livelihoods. We used the Conceptual Framework of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services to analyse the biocultural approaches to pollinator conservation by IPLCs globally. The analysis identified biocultural approaches to pollinators across all six elements of the Conceptual Framework, with conservation-related practices occurring in 60 countries, in all continents except Antarctica. Practices of IPLCs that are important for biocultural approaches to pollinator conservation can be grouped into three categories: the practice of valuing diversity and fostering biocultural diversity; landscape management practices; and diversified farming systems. Particular IPLCs may use some or all of these practices. Policies that recognize customary tenure over traditional lands, strengthen indigenous and community-conserved areas, promote heritage listing and support diversified farming systems within a food sovereignty approach are among several identified that strengthen biocultural approaches to pollinator conservation, and thereby deliver mutual benefits for pollinators and people.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemary Hill & Guiomar Nates-Parra & José Javier G. Quezada-Euán & Damayanti Buchori & Gretchen LeBuhn & Marcia M. Maués & Petina L. Pert & Peter K Kwapong & Shafqat Saeed & Sara J Breslow & Manuela , 2019. "Biocultural approaches to pollinator conservation," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(3), pages 214-222, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:2:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1038_s41893-019-0244-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0244-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0244-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-019-0244-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maderson, Siobhan, 2023. "Co-producing agricultural policy with beekeepers: Obstacles and opportunities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:2:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1038_s41893-019-0244-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.