Author
Listed:
- Erik Porse
(California State University, Sacramento
University of California, Los Angeles)
- Kathryn B. Mika
(University of California, Los Angeles)
- Elizaveta Litvak
(University of Utah)
- Kimberly F. Manago
(Colorado School of Mines)
- Terri S. Hogue
(Colorado School of Mines)
- Mark Gold
(University of California, Los Angeles)
- Diane E. Pataki
(University of Utah)
- Stephanie Pincetl
(University of California, Los Angeles)
Abstract
Los Angeles imports water over long distances to supplement local supplies. Reduced reliability of the available imports is driving many local agencies to promote conservation and enhance local water sources. These include stormwater capture, water reuse and groundwater. But financial considerations are often a significant impediment to project development, especially when comparing new and existing sources. Here we demonstrate a comprehensive approach for evaluating the economic implications of shifting to local water reliance in Los Angeles County. We show that local water supplies are economically competitive. Results from integrated hydroeconomic modelling of urban water in Los Angeles identify cost-effective water supply portfolios and conservation targets. Considering costs across the ‘full-cycles’ of urban water supply that span agency boundaries yields better comparisons of planning alternatives. Throughout the region, many water retailers could successfully mitigate effects of imported water cuts while still supporting drought-tolerant landscapes, but some would suffer due to over-reliance on imports. Updating economic assessment methods would support needed innovations to achieve local reliance in Los Angeles, including infrastructure investments, institutional reforms, many more drought-tolerant landscapes and reallocated groundwater rights.
Suggested Citation
Erik Porse & Kathryn B. Mika & Elizaveta Litvak & Kimberly F. Manago & Terri S. Hogue & Mark Gold & Diane E. Pataki & Stephanie Pincetl, 2018.
"The economic value of local water supplies in Los Angeles,"
Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(6), pages 289-297, June.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natsus:v:1:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1038_s41893-018-0068-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0068-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:1:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1038_s41893-018-0068-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.