IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v1y2018i11d10.1038_s41893-018-0171-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential increase of legal deforestation in Brazilian Amazon after Forest Act revision

Author

Listed:
  • Flavio L. M. Freitas

    (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering)

  • Gerd Sparovek

    (University of São Paulo, Soil Science Department)

  • Göran Berndes

    (Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory)

  • U. Martin Persson

    (Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory)

  • Oskar Englund

    (Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory
    Mid Sweden University)

  • Alberto Barretto

    (University of São Paulo, Soil Science Department)

  • Ulla Mörtberg

    (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering)

Abstract

The Brazilian Amazon rainforest is protected largely by command and control regulation of public and private land. The Brazilian Forest Act requires private landholders within the Amazon to set aside 80% of their land as legal reserves for nature protection, but this requirement can be reduced to 50% if more than 65% of a state’s territory is protected public land (for example, public conservation units and indigenous reserves). In the ongoing land designation process in Brazil, some Amazonian states may cross this 65% threshold. We assess the potential reduction in the legal reserve requirement from 80% to 50%, through spatially explicit modelling of scenarios concerning land tenure consolidation, employing up-to-date databases on land ownership. Depending on the outcome of land designation processes and political priorities, some 6.5–15.4 million hectares of private land previously protected as legal reserves may become available for legal deforestation. While protection of public land is crucial for safeguarding the Amazon, revisions of federal and state legislation may be needed to avoid the further extension of protected public land triggering increased legal deforestation on private lands. Zero-deforestation commitments and other initiatives may mitigate impacts in the absence of such revision.

Suggested Citation

  • Flavio L. M. Freitas & Gerd Sparovek & Göran Berndes & U. Martin Persson & Oskar Englund & Alberto Barretto & Ulla Mörtberg, 2018. "Potential increase of legal deforestation in Brazilian Amazon after Forest Act revision," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(11), pages 665-670, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:1:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1038_s41893-018-0171-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0171-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0171-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-018-0171-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van der Hoff, Richard & Rajão, Raoni, 2020. "The politics of environmental market instruments: Coalition building and knowledge filtering in the regulation of forest certificates trading in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Porro, Roberto & Porro, Noemi Sakiara Miyasaka, 2022. "State-led social and environmental policy failure in a Brazilian forest frontier: Sustainable Development Project in Anapu, Pará," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. West, Thales A.P. & Fearnside, Philip M., 2021. "Brazil’s conservation reform and the reduction of deforestation in Amazonia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Flach, Rafaela & Abrahão, Gabriel & Bryant, Benjamin & Scarabello, Marluce & Soterroni, Aline C. & Ramos, Fernando M. & Valin, Hugo & Obersteiner, Michael & Cohn, Avery S., 2021. "Conserving the Cerrado and Amazon biomes of Brazil protects the soy economy from damaging warming," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Andonova, Liliana B. & Piselli, Dario, 2022. "Transnational partnerships, domestic institutions, and sustainable development. The case of Brazil and the Amazon Region Protected Areas program," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Conceição, Katyanne V. & Chaves, Michel E.D. & Picoli, Michelle C.A. & Sánchez, Alber H. & Soares, Anderson R. & Mataveli, Guilherme A.V. & Silva, Daniel E. & Costa, Joelma S. & Camara, Gilberto, 2021. "Government policies endanger the indigenous peoples of the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Burgess, Robin & Costa, Francisco J M & Olken, Ben, 2019. "The Brazilian Amazon’s Double Reversal of Fortune," SocArXiv 67xg5, Center for Open Science.
    8. Malhado, Ana C.M. & Santos, Janisson & Correia, Ricardo A. & Campos-Silva, João V. & Teles, Davi & Costa, Marcos H. & Jepson, Paul & Ladle, Richard J., 2020. "Monitoring and mapping non-governmental conservation action in Amazonia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:1:y:2018:i:11:d:10.1038_s41893-018-0171-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.