IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v8y2024i7d10.1038_s41562-024-01870-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Images with harder-to-reconstruct visual representations leave stronger memory traces

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Lin

    (Yale University
    RIKEN)

  • Zifan Li

    (Yale University)

  • John Lafferty

    (Yale University
    Yale University)

  • Ilker Yildirim

    (Yale University
    Yale University
    Yale University)

Abstract

Much of what we remember is not because of intentional selection, but simply a by-product of perceiving. This raises a foundational question about the architecture of the mind: how does perception interface with and influence memory? Here, inspired by a classic proposal relating perceptual processing to memory durability, the level-of-processing theory, we present a sparse coding model for compressing feature embeddings of images, and show that the reconstruction residuals from this model predict how well images are encoded into memory. In an open memorability dataset of scene images, we show that reconstruction error not only explains memory accuracy, but also response latencies during retrieval, subsuming, in the latter case, all of the variance explained by powerful vision-only models. We also confirm a prediction of this account with ‘model-driven psychophysics’. This work establishes reconstruction error as an important signal interfacing perception and memory, possibly through adaptive modulation of perceptual processing.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Lin & Zifan Li & John Lafferty & Ilker Yildirim, 2024. "Images with harder-to-reconstruct visual representations leave stronger memory traces," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 1309-1320, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-024-01870-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01870-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01870-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-024-01870-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-024-01870-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.